|
|
|
13,539 posts
|
18 likes
|
|
|
Oct 5, 2018 15:33:41 GMT -5
|
Timeline Keeper
|
Post by Angel on Nov 22, 2010 1:44:04 GMT -5
Thread: Seeing Spots Not meaning to cut your RP short, Patch, but considering that you and Angel need to be present at the hero outpost for Sting in the Dark that same evening, they ought to be leaving soon. As soon as you come out of your cave/garden, Patch is going to have to leave with Angel, okay?
|
|
patch
Guest
|
|
|
0 posts
|
likes
|
|
|
Nov 16, 2024 0:34:18 GMT -5
|
|
Post by patch on Nov 22, 2010 1:45:28 GMT -5
okay Angel
|
|
|
|
|
3,369 posts
|
1 like
|
trololol~
|
|
Apr 9, 2013 0:56:26 GMT -5
|
Top Rank Officer
|
Post by Lurker on Nov 23, 2010 0:38:33 GMT -5
Thread: How could this happen? OOC: I thought Angel was older than Scamp? Her app said she was 15 (in dog years) and that Scamp was 14....
|
|
|
|
|
13,539 posts
|
18 likes
|
|
|
Oct 5, 2018 15:33:41 GMT -5
|
Timeline Keeper
|
Post by Angel on Nov 23, 2010 1:38:09 GMT -5
Well, that was what I thought originally, but Lady knows much more about L&tT than I do, so I'll go along with whatever she says. I guess Angel just seemed older to me because of her experiences on the streets. I just ought to change Scamp's app when I'm next logged in as him.
|
|
|
|
|
3,369 posts
|
1 like
|
trololol~
|
|
Apr 9, 2013 0:56:26 GMT -5
|
Top Rank Officer
|
Post by Lurker on Nov 23, 2010 1:54:52 GMT -5
Okay....doesnt the tramp get any say in this matter at all?? ^^" sorry, I just can't see him cheating on Lady AFTER she's already pregnant. Maybe when they're still young and "dating" but not after.
|
|
|
|
|
13,539 posts
|
18 likes
|
|
|
Oct 5, 2018 15:33:41 GMT -5
|
Timeline Keeper
|
Post by Angel on Nov 23, 2010 1:57:58 GMT -5
That was also part of my thinking when I put Scamp as the younger, but I'm not entirely sure. You'll have to take it up with Lady via PM, I guess. I don't really know.
Hypothetically, couldn't Angel have been concieved BEFORE Scamp and co were, but if Scamp and his sisters were born early and Angel late, that could explain a bit of difference, perhaps?
|
|
|
|
|
3,369 posts
|
1 like
|
trololol~
|
|
Apr 9, 2013 0:56:26 GMT -5
|
Top Rank Officer
|
Post by Lurker on Nov 23, 2010 2:09:31 GMT -5
Hm, you make a good point. I like that idea. That way it WOULD really seem like Tramp cheated on Lady after her pups were concieved but in reality it was before. Points for you, Angel!
|
|
|
|
|
13,539 posts
|
18 likes
|
|
|
Oct 5, 2018 15:33:41 GMT -5
|
Timeline Keeper
|
Post by Angel on Nov 23, 2010 2:12:29 GMT -5
You may still need to discuss it with Lady - half a year (even if it's dog years) sounds a little too much of a gap between their dates of birth, if this is the case.
|
|
|
|
|
3,369 posts
|
1 like
|
trololol~
|
|
Apr 9, 2013 0:56:26 GMT -5
|
Top Rank Officer
|
Post by Lurker on Nov 23, 2010 2:15:26 GMT -5
Ya see, I don't know all that much about dogs (even though I have one) or tooooo much about LatT either. I HAVE seen both films, but never really studied it in depth. I'll PM her. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
13,539 posts
|
18 likes
|
|
|
Oct 5, 2018 15:33:41 GMT -5
|
Timeline Keeper
|
Post by Angel on Nov 23, 2010 2:16:06 GMT -5
If we do go by that reasoning, Tramp wouldn't even have been cheating on Lady - if I remember corrrectly, the DVD bonus features implied that her pups were concieved in the night they spent together in the park in L&tT.
|
|
|
|
|
3,369 posts
|
1 like
|
trololol~
|
|
Apr 9, 2013 0:56:26 GMT -5
|
Top Rank Officer
|
Post by Lurker on Nov 23, 2010 2:32:08 GMT -5
I never watched the DVD bonus.
So....you're right! Lol that'd be nice then. Doesn't matter if he's just a character: I am not a fan of cheating....
|
|
|
|
|
13,539 posts
|
18 likes
|
|
|
Oct 5, 2018 15:33:41 GMT -5
|
Timeline Keeper
|
Post by Angel on Nov 23, 2010 14:22:57 GMT -5
Hello? We need SOMEBODY in Rise and Shine to splash water over Lucky and snap him out of his Hunkahunka-induced love coma. Possibly Reuben - I'm certain he'd recognise it as Hunkahunka's work. Just somebody do SOMETHING there!
|
|
thetexas
Guest
|
|
|
0 posts
|
likes
|
|
|
Nov 16, 2024 0:34:18 GMT -5
|
|
Post by thetexas on Nov 23, 2010 16:49:39 GMT -5
You may still need to discuss it with Lady - half a year (even if it's dog years) sounds a little too much of a gap between their dates of birth, if this is the case. OOC: Lady/Tramp cheating: I already talked with Kiara about that. Please remember that right now in the RP, Lady is very, very emotional. Remember...Lady is speculating more then anything. Shes in an emotional state and in many respects, shes attempting to convince herself, as much as anyone else, whether or not Tramp deserve her love. Lady can not read minds, much less the Tramps, and she has tried to reach out to him. Unless Tramp defends himself to her and tries to prove himself and earn her trust, then she is just gonna keep speculating till she feels its set in stone. remember, I'm trying to Play Lady from all angles, and part of her naivety is her own overactive imagination. I do not mean to "Outsource" a fellow player or set soemthing in stone, but rather to show Lady, telling herself something to the point she feels its true, which it may, or may not be. Its all up in the air, and until Lady herself in convened that its not true...she doesn't want the Tramp as her mate. Thats what it all comes down too. her conversation with Angel is as much an attempt to tell herself that its true as it is a let in to Angel on her feelings. I dunno if or if not, Tramp cheating on Lady should be set in stone. I was gonna just leave that one up to the Tramp. I guess it could happen seeing his past relationships and such...at least...early on....but I dunno... In my honest opinion, I think it would create some great friction between the two, as well as open up some avenues for some interesting role-playing. Both on and off the battlefield. Angel/Scamp age difference: Yes, Scamp and his sisters where conceived on the same night as the Bella Nottie sequence, as both admitted via the DVD bonuses, and the "Lady and the Tramp" Novelization by Greene. IF, and thats a big IF, Tramp cheated on Lady, it would have occurred after this event. Angel must be younger then Scamp due to her having no recollection of Tramp being in the junkyard dogs aside from stories. (IE: "I heard he found his true love" "Your father is THE Tramp" "He was the greatest street dog that ever lived") Remember, dogs don't go threw pregnancy like we do. They usual last about 9 weeks after the initial fertilization. So...anytime within those first nine weeks, Angel may have been conceived. She doesn't have to be more then 1 week younger then Scamp for Lady's theory to be valid. Since obviously she knows Tramp threw legend, and the second film occurs three months after the ending of the first, I think that indeed Angel may be as much as a month younger, but no less then a week. I do apologize for the long information flood ^^ I guess I may have spent too much time cross examining an animated film for my own good XD
|
|
|
|
|
13,539 posts
|
18 likes
|
|
|
Oct 5, 2018 15:33:41 GMT -5
|
Timeline Keeper
|
Post by Angel on Nov 23, 2010 16:55:12 GMT -5
The second film's set six months after the original ends, surely? Considering that it's set around the fourth of July, and the first film ended at Christmas time?
|
|
thetexas
Guest
|
|
|
0 posts
|
likes
|
|
|
Nov 16, 2024 0:34:18 GMT -5
|
|
Post by thetexas on Nov 23, 2010 17:04:01 GMT -5
well..in essence...when the 2nd film is set doesn't matter. (You are right, six months afterward is correct) in fact...it just makes Lady's theory even more valid. More time for Angel to grow and become closer to Scamp in size and maturity.
but once again...all Angel has to be...is one week younger, and it could have occurred.
Of course I have to stress this is all speculation! Speculation done in the mind of a girl whose under a considerable amount of stress.
|
|